Prosthetic joints are at risk of acute and chronic infection, which can cause sepsis, morbidity, or mortality. Symptoms include joint pain, swelling, and limited motion. Diagnosis may be difficult to confirm and is based on various criteria. Treatment is prolonged antibiotic therapy and usually arthrotomy.
Etiology of Prosthetic Joint Infectious Arthritis
Infections are more common in prosthetic joints than in native joints. They are frequently caused by perioperative inoculations of bacteria into the joint or by postoperative bacteremia resulting from skin infection, pneumonia, ra, invasive instrumentation, urinary tract infection, possibly falls, or rarely dental procedures.
Joint infections develop within 1 year of surgery in two-thirds of cases (1). During the first few months after surgery, Staphylococcus aureus is the cause of infection in approximately 50% of cases; less common causes are mixed flora, gram-negative organisms, and anaerobes (2). Cutibacterium acnes is especially common in infected prosthetic shoulder joints and may require prolonged culture (up to 2 weeks) to detect (3). Candida species can infect prosthetic joints, but Candida infection is rare (4).
Etiology references
1. Hasenauer MD, Ho H, Engh CA 3rd, Engh CA Jr. Factors Associated With the Incidence and Timing of Total Knee Arthroplasty Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2022;37(6S):S276-S280.e3. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.034
2. Tsaras G, Osmon DR, Mabry T, et al. Incidence, secular trends, and outcomes of prosthetic joint infection: a population-based study, olmsted county, Minnesota, 1969-2007. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012;33(12):1207-1212. doi:10.1086/668421
3. Vilchez HH, Escudero-Sanchez R, Fernandez-Sampedro M, et al. Prosthetic Shoulder Joint Infection by Cutibacterium acnes: Does Rifampin Improve Prognosis? A Retrospective, Multicenter, Observational Study. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10(5):475. Published 2021 Apr 21. doi:10.3390/antibiotics10050475
4. Grzelecki D, Grajek A, Dudek P, et al. Periprosthetic Joint Infections Caused by Candida Species-A Single-Center Experience and Systematic Review of the Literature. J Fungi (Basel). 2022;8(8):797. Published 2022 Jul 29. doi:10.3390/jof8080797
Risk Factors for Prosthetic Joint Infectious Arthritis
Patient-related and surgical risk factors may increase the risk of a prosthetic joint infection.
Patient-specific risk factors include (1).
Immunosuppression (eg, from prednisone, TNF inhibitors, other biologics)
Rheumatoid arthritis
Diabetes mellitus
Malignancy
Chronic kidney disease
Obesity
Surgery-specific risk factors include prior arthroplasty, prior surgical site infection, duration of surgery, post operative complications (eg hematoma or wound dehiscence), and concomitant S. aureus bacteremia (2).
Risk factors references
1. Kunutsor SK, Whitehouse MR, Blom AW, Beswick AD; INFORM Team. Patient-Related Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infection after Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0150866. Published 2016 Mar 3. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150866
2. Tande AJ, Palraj BR, Osmon DR, et al. Clinical Presentation, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Hematogenous Prosthetic Joint Infection in Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Am J Med. 2016;129(2):221.e11-221.e2.21E20. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.09.006
Symptoms and Signs of Prosthetic Joint Infectious Arthritis
Symptoms and signs of prosthetic joint infection are dependent on time from surgery and can be further classified as early, delayed onset, and late onset (1), (2).
Early/acute infection occurs within 3 months of surgery. The onset is sudden, and the joint appears swollen, painful, and erythematous. Systemic symptoms such as fevers and chills are usually present. These infections are typically acquired during the surgical procedure.
Delayed onset infection occurs between 3 to 12 months after surgery. There may be persistent wound drainage (eg, sinus tract) and the joint appears warm, swollen, and painful. The infection is likely acquired during arthroplasty or in the early postoperative period.
Late onset infection occurs more than 12 months after the initial surgery. There is an acute onset of joint pain, tenderness, and erythema in a previously well-functioning joint. The infection is likely acquired by hematogenous seeding from another infection site.
Symptoms and signs references
1. Parvizi J, Gehrke T; International Consensus Group on Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Definition of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(7):1331. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.009
2. Barrett L, Atkins B. The clinical presentation of prosthetic joint infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69 Suppl 1:i25-i27. doi:10.1093/jac/dku250
Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infectious Arthritis
Clinical, microbiologic, pathologic, and imaging criteria
The diagnosis of infection in a prosthetic joint often requires a combination of clinical, microbiologic, pathologic, and imaging criteria. There is no standardized approach to diagnosing a prosthetic joint infection, and multiple criteria have been proposed (1, 2, 3, 4).
Definitive diagnosis of a prosthetic joint infection can be made when 2 cultures from the joint are positive for the same organism. A communication between a sinus tract and the prosthesis may also be diagnostic (2).
The serum C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and D-dimer may all be elevated in prosthetic joint infections. Synovial fluid should be sampled for cell count and culture. In early infection, the synovial fluid white blood count (WBC) is typically > 10,000 cells/mcL (10 × 109/L) (5).
In delayed-onset or late-onset infection, the synovial fluid WBC count is typically > 3000 cells/microL. The synovial fluid should also be analyzed for cell count differential.
In acute infection, the percentage of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) is typically > 90% and in delayed-onset and late-onset infections, the percentage of PMNs is typically > 80%. A positive synovial fluid alpha-defensin test may be a marker of infection as well (6).
Radiographs may show periosteal reaction or loosening of the prosthesis or periosteal reaction but are not diagnostic. Technetium-99m bone scanning and indium-labeled white blood cell scanning are more sensitive than radiographs but lack specificity in the immediate postoperative period. Periprosthetic tissue collected at the time of surgery may be sent for culture and histologic analysis (4).
Diagnosis references
1. Parvizi J, Gehrke T; International Consensus Group on Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Definition of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(7):1331. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.009
2. Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K, et al. The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(5):1309-1314.e2. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078
3. McNally M, Sousa R, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, et al. The EBJIS definition of periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J. 2021;103-B(1):18-25. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-1381.R1
4. Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, et al. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(1):e1-e25. doi:10.1093/cid/cis803
5. Beam E, Osmon D. Prosthetic Joint Infection Update. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2018;32(4):843-859. doi:10.1016/j.idc.2018.06.005
6. Lee YS, Koo KH, Kim HJ, et al. Synovial Fluid Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(24):2077-2084. doi:10.2106/JBJS.17.00123
Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infectious Arthritis
Arthrotomy with debridement
Prosthesis replacement
Long-term systemic antibiotic therapy
Treatment of prosthetic joint infection must be prolonged and usually involves arthrotomy for prosthesis removal with meticulous debridement of all cement, abscesses, and devitalized tissues. Debridement is followed by immediate prosthesis replacement, or placement of an antibiotic-impregnated spacer and then delayed (2 to 4 months) implantation of a new prosthesis using antibiotic-impregnated cement (1).
Long-term systemic antibiotic therapy is used in either case (1); empiric therapy is initiated after intraoperative culture is done and usually combines coverage for methicillin-resistant gram-positive organisms (eg, vancomycin 1 g IV every 12 hours) and aerobic gram-negative organisms (eg, piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g IV every 6 hours or ceftazidime 2 g IV every 8 hours) and is revised based on results of culture and sensitivity testing.
If the prosthetic joint infection is caused by S. aureus, antibiotic therapy includes a 6-week course of pathogen-specific therapy in combination with rifampin 300 mg to 450 mg orally twice a day for biofilm penetration. After the initial treatment course of 6 weeks, therapy is continued with rifampin plus a companion oral antibiotic (ideally levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin if susceptible) for 3 months in hip infections and 6 months in knee infections (1).
The overall rate of infection-free success at 5 years depends on the surgical approach, but can be close to 80% after combined medical and surgical treatment (2), (3).
Excision arthroplasty with or without fusion usually is reserved for patients with uncontrolled infection and insufficient bone stock.
Treatment references
1. Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, et al. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(1):e1-e25. doi:10.1093/cid/cis803
2. Berbari EF, Osmon DR, Duffy MC, et al. Outcome of prosthetic joint infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the impact of medical and surgical therapy in 200 episodes. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(2):216-223. doi:10.1086/498507
3. Sousa R, Abreu MA. Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infection with Debridement, Antibiotics and Irrigation with Implant Retention - a Narrative Review. J Bone Jt Infect. 2018;3(3):108-117. Published 2018 Jun 8. doi:10.7150/jbji.24285
Prevention of Prosthetic Joint Infectious Arthritis
In the absence of other indications (eg, valvular heart disease), prophylactic antibiotics are not routinely recommended before dental work (1). See Appropriate Use Criteria from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) for the prevention of orthopedic implant infection in patients undergoing dental procedures. However, prophylactic antibiotics may be recommended for patients undergoing urologic procedures associated with a high risk of bacteremia (eg, lithotripsy).
At many centers, patients are screened for S. aureus colonization using nasal cultures. Carriers are decolonized with mupirocin ointment before surgery to implant a prosthetic joint (2).
Prevention references
1. Sollecito TP, Abt E, Lockhart PB, et al. The use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to dental procedures in patients with prosthetic joints: Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for dental practitioners--a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc. 2015;146(1):11-16.e8. doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2014.11.012
2. Smith M, Herwaldt L. Nasal decolonization: What antimicrobials and antiseptics are most effective before surgery and in the ICU. Am J Infect Control. 2023;51(11S):A64-A71. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2023.02.004
Key Points
Suspect prosthetic joint infectious arthritis in patients with a warm, erythematous, tender joint, or persistent unexplained joint pain, with the highest risk being within a year of surgery.
Perform joint aspiration and send for culture and synovial fluid analysis;radiographs and routine laboratory studies are seldom helpful.
Treat with both arthrotomy and debridement and targeted long-term systemic antibiotics.
Add rifampin to antistaphylococcal antibiotics to increase biofilm penetration.
Reference
1. Sollecito TP, Abt E, Lockhart PB, et al. The use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to dental procedures in patients with prosthetic joints: Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for dental practitioners--a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc. 2015;146(1):11-16.e8. doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2014.11.012